Since, the Thai government was not for expanding the charges furthermore the task was not being based in view of the proposed course of events, Hopewell holding restricted, according to the assention, could request reestablishment and increment in concession period. The present concession period was of 30 years with 8 years development period if the Thai government takes into consideration increment in concession period, then Sir Gordon Wu could finish the task at a benefit absolutely as it would give his organization more opportunity to acquire incomes from the BERT venture.
1. Could Sir Gordon Wu take steps to complete BERTS at a profit? Which steps?
2. Even if the project was ultimately successful, did the near-debacle with BERTS indicate that large BOT projects in developing countries were simply too risky for firms like HHL?
3. It appears that Sir Gordon Wu intends to continue HHL’s infrastructure development business. Is this the right decision for HHL’s shareholders?
4. Can HHL take steps to minimize the risks associated with future infrastructure development projects? Alternately, would an entirely new corporate strategy — perhaps one that concentrates on its property development business — be better for shareholders?